Digital Support Team Web • May 25, 2021

Human Abilities and the Bell Curve

The United States Bill of Rights states, “that all men are created equal.” Well, it that a truth? I guess what it is supposed to mean is in a free society all men have an EQUAL OPPORTUNITY to the pursuit or personal happiness. But, even that is not necessarily true. There is a saying that “one man’s floor is another man’s ceiling.” Does being born as a coal miner’s child offer the same opportunities as being born to billionaire parents? Not hardly! Was Forrest Gump born with the same intellectual ability as Albert Einstein? Yeah right! Was Danny DeVito born with the same physical attributes as Shaquille O’Neil for basketball greatness? That one’s a real joke!

Draw the shape of a bell on a piece of paper with the top of the bell being considerably smaller than the bottom of the bell. Now, extend the bottom lip of the bell on both the left and right sides. Put a plus (+) on the left side at the base and a minus (-) on the right side. Then draw a solid line in the middle of the bell straight down from the top to the bottom. There you have a simple illustration of HUMAN ABILITIES, with two very apparent and very opposite extremes. Einstein would go to the extreme left side of the bell curve (i.e., +) and an individual who could not be taught how to tie his shoes (i.e. a moon) would go on the extreme right side of the bell curve (i.e., -)

Using this analogy, all seven billion of us fall somewhere whitin these two extremes, with the average person being directly in the middle. Genius’s and morons, giants and midgets, obese and thin, extroverts and introverts, extremely strong and extremely weak, beautiful and ugly, and yes, this also applies to physical attributes. People have different abilities with some being almost superhuman while others are directly opposite. Imagine if at the beginning of their careers, Woody Allen and Arnold Schwarzenegger both had the same goal of being a champion bodybuilder. What do you think the outcome would be?

All of us are governed by our genetic predisposition of which our human abilities all fall somewhere within the two extremes of the bell curve. This is also very applicable when it comes to producing RESULTS from exercise. While doing exactly the same PROPERLY DESIGNED EXERCISE PROTOCOL some will produce outstanding results, while others will produce good results and still others will experience well below average results. But if PEOPER exercise application is applies everyone should experience results. The determining factor though for producing results will lie between the two extreme ends of the bell curve.

By Digital Support Team Web 25 May, 2021
All exercise must provide resistance and movement. The value of the exercise can be determined by the “quality” of the resistance and the “quality” of movement. The harder the resistance in an exercise becomes the more productive the exercise becomes for strength increasing purposes. Most people, however, confuse HARDER exercise with MORE exercise, which is a huge misconception. In a set of resistance exercises, if an individual is capable of performing ten properly executed repetitions with 100 pounds, and with the last repetition, the 10th repetition, being an all-out maximal effort repetition, the question arises, “Which repetition in that set of 10 repetitions is the most productive repetition? The first one or the last one?” Well, it’s obvious. The answer is the last one. Now, what is changing repetition by repetition that is making the exercise more productive? Is the resistance changing? No, it’s the same 100 pounds. Is the distance of movement changing? No, it is the exact same distance with every rep. The first thing that is changing repetition by repetition that is making the exercise more stimulating is the INTENSITY OF EFFORT being exerted. Replication by repetition the movement is getting progressively harder. The hardest rep, the most productive rep, is the very last rep that can barely be accomplished in good form. Now what if this same individual decided not to do the last repetitions. The 8th, 9th, and 10th reps, because it was getting harder, so they decided to make up for those last reps by doing two more sets using the same weight, but stopping the sets at 7 reps. Question: Would this increased volume of exercise (i.e., doing more exercise sets) make the exercise as stimulating and productive as doing only one set, but carrying that set to momentary muscular failure? The answer is No. The reason is that all muscles contract on an ALL or NOTHING basis, meaning that the whole muscle when called upon to move something does not contract in its entirety, but individual muscle fibers contract and only to the point of producing movement. So, the harder the exercise becomes, the more muscles fibers are called upon to contract to continue to product movement. If an individual did 20 sets of the same exercise with the same weight but stopped 2 to 3 reps sort of an all-out effort, the exercise would be greatly compromised in its stimulations. Also, the more work that is placed on the muscles and the entire physical system as a whole, the more energy is being consumed making the body much more exhausted. This reduces the body’s ability to recover after the exercise session has been completed. Regardless of how much muscular stimulation has been produced, if the body’s resources are not available for recovery, the individual cannot and will not improve. Even if the multiple sets of the same exercise were performed correctly, the physical system (systemic recovery) would be so exhausted from doing too much work that it could not positively respond. For strengthening purposes all anaerobic exercise protocols should be as HARD as possible and as BRIEF as possible. This protocol will work as many muscle fibers as possible while reducing the exhaustive demands of the exercises as on the body.
By Digital Support Team Web 25 May, 2021
QUESTION - What do all other personal trainers use to measure the ongoing results of their clients? NOTHING! It’s always speculative and emotional, “Well, I feel better!”, “I think it’s working", “My trainer is really nice", “I can really feel it." Without having SOMETHING DEFINITIVE to measure a client’s results or lack of results EVERY WORKOUT, no one can know WITH ANY CERTAINTY if their program is working or if it is a waste of time! ALL beneficial results that are attained through “proper” Progressive exercise are based solely on “strengthening!” You cannot increase bone density without strengthening the bones of your body! You cannot improve the tendons and ligaments of your body without strengthening them! You cannot improve your heart and lungs without strengthening your heart and lungs! You cannot firm, tone or improve in any way the muscles of your body without strengthening them! IT IS SIMPLY IMPOSSIBLE! As a matter of fact, outside of cosmetic surgery, there are only two things that you or anyone else can do to change the appearance, mobility and functionality of the body. 1. You can Gain or Lose Fat 2. You can Gain or Lose Muscle However, within the confines of these two seemingly limiting factors, DRAMATIC RESULTS can be witnesses by almost anyone IF the PROPER exercise protocol is understood and applied. Over 95% of what is being promoted today through exercise infomercials, celebrity exercise videos, fitness magazines, extreme makeover shows, fitness centers and especially personal trainers IS NOT ONLY NON-PRODUCTIVE NONSENSE BUT IN MANY CASES IS OUTRIGHT DANGEROUS! DON’T BE MISLED! STOP BEING CONFUSED! THERE IS AN ABSOLUTE SCIENTIFIC REALITY TO DESIGNING A PROPER PROGRESSIVE EXERCISE PROTOCOL. IT IS AN ABSOLUTE REQUIREMENT THAT ALL MPT TRAINERS, REGARDLESS OF ANY PREVIOUS EDUCATION OR EXPERIENCE, BE EDUCATED, TRAINED AND CERTIFIED BY MY PERSONAL TRAINER CERTIFICANTION TRAINING PROGRAM CALLED B.O.S.S. B.O.S.S. ASSURES THAT ALL MPT CLIENTS RECEIVE THE MOST ACCURATE, NO NONSENSE, TRUTHFUL AND RESULTS PRODUCING EXERCISE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TODAY! SO, ARE ALL PERSONAL TRAINERS CREATED EQUAL? Once the physiological facts are clearly understood, the answer becomes very self-evident!
By Digital Support Team Web 25 May, 2021
Once you learn how to write your name, you’re not going to improve your handwriting or your spelling by writing your name over and over again. The same thing is true with exercise. You’re not going to continue to increase strength and improve your body while continually using the same weight in exactly the same amount of time each week. The body will only be stimulated to improve by placing a physical demand on it that it is not accustomed to doing. In order for an exercise to continually be productive (i.e., increase strength) it must continually be progressive in the intensity of effort being exerted. A woman over the years that participated in an aerobics type of dance class or similar program (and there has been scores of them under different names) regardless of the amount of time she has been doing it, be it only two weeks or two years, will have gotten the same exact physical benefit. Why? Because of the intensity of effort or stress that is being placed on her body IS ALWAYS THE SAME. If she has been doing it for two years, the actual benefits or improvement took place in the first two weeks, and the other one year, eleven months and fourteen days were just maintenance. NO ADDITIONAL IMRPOVEMENT!
More Posts
Share by: